How did you get interested in interspiritual mysticism?
I came of age in the late 1970s and early 1980s, a time when “interspiritual mysticism” was in the air (although we didn’t call it that back then). Everyone knew the Beatles went to India to study meditation with the Maharishi, and George Harrison came back and wrote My Sweet Lord, which 50 years later is still the most beautiful interspiritual song I’ve ever heard.
Meanwhile, writers like Alan Watts, Krishnamurti, Paramahansa Yogananda, Ram Dass, Carlos Castaneda, and many others were writing about spirituality from perspectives other than the garden-variety Protestant Christianity that I grew up in. It was part of the zeitgeist of the post-hippie era that spiritual practices from the east: yoga, zen, advaita vedanta, and so forth — were widely accepted as meaningful paths for inner exploration. Meanwhile, other authors, like Evelyn Underhill, Morton Kelsey, and Thomas Merton, were introducing me to the mystical tradition within Christianity, which (again) was not really a topic of exploration in my neighborhood suburban church. For me, it was a revelation to see that I could read books like Yogananda’s Autobiography of a Yogi and Underhill’s Mysticism and recognize that, at a level deeper than the cultural distinctions of our different religious traditions, there is a universal oneness: what Wayne Teasdale (who coined the word “interspirituality”) called The Mystic Heart.
For me personally, while I was raised as a Christian and in many ways it remains my “home” faith, thanks to the cultural zeitgeist of my youth, I’ve always been a bit of a wanderer. In my young adult years I was active in the Episcopal Church but also studying meditation at the Shalem Institute, where I was introduced to Tibetan Buddhism. Meanwhile, many of my friends were engaging in Wicca and other forms of nature/goddess spirituality. Again and again I could see the mystical unity beneath all these different religious forms. And in the words of Pete the Cat, I could see that “It’s all good!”
What benefit is there to approaching spirituality from an interspiritual perspective?
Ultimately, I think interspirituality is about the truth. As much as I love Christian mysticism, the long tradition within Christianity of labelling other faiths and spiritualities as “demonic” or “erroneous” or “superstitious” or even merely “inferior” is simply a great tragedy — and manifestly untrue.
Granted, individuals (and even entire communities or nations) might find that they are more comfortable with one particular faith tradition, or find it easier to go deeper by being loyal to their one chosen path. I have no problem with that; in fact, I believe it is a good spiritual practice to be faithful to one particular tradition — it’s a great discipline for lessening the hold of the ego. So Christianity (or any other positive spirituality) might be “the one true path” for some people. But that doesn’t make it universally the “only” way. So interspirituality helps us to remember the basic, evident truth that there are many paths up the mountain (and you can be interspiritual while also diving deep into your primary spiritual path; in fact, I suspect most interspiritual contemplatives follow that model, diving deep into one particular tradition but getting richly nourished from others as well).
Interspirituality is also beneficial because it can help individuals (and groups) to be more compassionate, hospitable and generous toward those who are different from ourselves. Religious violence — from the Holy Land to Northern Ireland to the violence against Muslims and Jews in America — is always tragic and utterly needless. Interspirituality teaches us to respect the humanity of all people, and the more people who get that lesson, the less violence there will be in the future.
Stay tuned for Part Two of my interview – coming next week!
Thanks, I have just been looking for information about this subject for a long time and yours is the best I’ve discovered till now. However, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you certain in regards to the supply?